|
|
Post by Fawkes on Nov 28, 2005 9:02:16 GMT -5
if i didn't know any better, i'd say you didn't like it I actually loved it. It is my favorite of the 4. I was just comenting that they had changed a lot. The surprising thing is, while watching the previous movies, I used to get really irritated even if a small part was changed but even though GoF had the maximum changes made, I still loved it. ;D |
|
|
|
Post by tanya on Mar 31, 2006 19:14:42 GMT -5
ummm i liked it but i liked the third movie better......but thats just me
|
|
|
|
Post by Mary9836 on Jan 2, 2007 17:21:05 GMT -5
i really am gonna be honest and say that i watch all the movies...but i don't like them...the books are always gonna be better and i'm always gonna be critical and comment went they have changed things and added things in that have nothing to do with anything
This movie made me mad cause barty crouch's son did this tongue thing..like he would slurp or wiggle his tongue, i dunno..i can't describe it...it was just stupid and made no sense to me...it weirded me out and then the movie was ruined cause i was constantly questioning why that character was trying to lick the side of his face...it was just creepy...oh and there was no dobby! GRR!
|
|
|
|
Post by bookluver14 on Jan 2, 2007 20:45:22 GMT -5
hahah. see, i loved that bit. it made him have real character, and every bit more like voldemort himself. snake like... evil. it sort of gave audiences that hadn't read the book another clue to the puzzle.
But, yes. it was annoying that there was no dobby. but he really didn't play that big of a part in the book that mattered in the movie, because they easily transfered the 2nt task role to Neville.
I am a big fan of the movies, even though they can never reach the expectations the books lie down. But why shouldn't we love the movies? okay okay.. they don't follow the books word for word? so? The cinamatography is really good, most of the actors are good (Spare mr. radcliff) they manage a very good screenplay, not to mention toss in lots of stuff that is brilliant. They do an amazing job, and the movies are good- despite the books. even without them.
|
|
|
|
Post by bookluver14 on Mar 10, 2007 17:31:07 GMT -5
*claps*
wow, that was good writing by me. if i do say so.
anyway -bumps-
what do we think of the 4th movie, and how will it compare to the fifth?
*eyes widen*
|
|
|
|
Post by Mary9836 on Aug 5, 2007 0:04:51 GMT -5
GOF irritated me with those stupid uniforms...and they overdramatized the tasks....grrr
|
|
|
|
Post by ravenclaw18 on Aug 5, 2007 7:56:40 GMT -5
Well, if they suddenly introduced dragon-fighting and extreme scuba-diving to my school lessons, I'd expect it to be pretty dramatic.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mary9836 on Aug 5, 2007 21:35:53 GMT -5
i would have though it was fine if all that junk had been in the book....but they added a broom ride to escape the dragon and the maze hedges moved and changed direction, I thought it was a waste of time.
Krum was also casted wrong. Thats not how i pictured him at all....the could have at least looked at the illistrations in the book when they were considering his part.
|
|
|
|
Post by ravenclaw18 on Aug 6, 2007 3:52:36 GMT -5
I've never had a Harry Potter book with illustrations that weren't just on the cover.
|
|
]
