|
Post by Mary9836 on Jul 20, 2005 1:48:13 GMT -5
okay, well i dunno if you READ the second chapter..but it totally explained how Snape pulled one over on Dumbledore..and he has been fooled before..LV was wondering around in someones head the first book....Petter Petigrew was living in ron's pocket for ever...okay and Mad-Eye was really Barty Crouch...i mean Dumbledore has been deceived.
And like Harry's weakness are the people he cares for, wanting to play hero to them Dumbledore has that weakness in seeing the good in people. I dunno, mayb dumbledore along with the reat of us were dooped!
|
|
|
Post by Nina on Jul 20, 2005 9:26:31 GMT -5
Sorry to dissapoint you geedunk, but I have made the conclusion that Snape is NOT evil.. And you know how I'm always right about these things lately! lol
|
|
|
Post by blorg358 on Jul 20, 2005 12:39:29 GMT -5
mary, I dont think the second chapter proves anything. Snape and Dumbledore could have thought that explanation up together for all we know! It could have been made up to deceive LV, not Dumbledore... second chapter just confuses me more, if anything lol
|
|
|
Post by harrylover on Jul 20, 2005 12:47:01 GMT -5
Omg i was really upset when dumbledore died,I finished it by about 2 in the afternoon and was depressed all day! but... i dont think snapes evil i think DD was pleading for snape to kill him coz snape is the only one that could do avada kedavra or whatever ,i reckon snape a good guy really And I love Harry and Ginny together!!! i have said that on about 20 boards now ;D they have to get together again sometime in the 7th book if they survive....I hope she goes with harry ron and hermione wherever they go!
|
|
|
Post by Mary9836 on Jul 20, 2005 14:33:21 GMT -5
no no, Snape is bad to the bone! I mean why not tell at least one other member of the OotP to explain or something? He's bad, bad bad bad! He ran away, and got really mad when called a coward and was still yelling about this and that towards Harry! Snape is bad, i'm gonna take what i read at face value...Snape=bad Death Eater
|
|
|
Post by blorg358 on Jul 20, 2005 15:42:32 GMT -5
Im neutral right now, I want to read the book again before deciding whether snape is evil or good... but if he's good, then he probably didn't tell the OotP about planning Dumbledore's death because they wouldn't have let it happen
|
|
|
Post by harrylover on Jul 20, 2005 16:41:26 GMT -5
lol im sticking with snape being a good guy but why couldnt they just wake the dumbledore in the portrait and ask him what happened? wierd and i agree with blorg the order wouldnt have let it happen you saw what they were like when he died none of them would have been able to do it.
|
|
|
Post by blorg358 on Jul 20, 2005 19:34:41 GMT -5
OMG I know!! When it said Dumbledore was sleeping against his frame, I thought, YES! Now he's going to explain everything! .... and they didnt wake him up! so annoying.. LOL everyone says the sixth is either their favorite book, or they're just mad about dumbledore dying
|
|
|
Post by Mary9836 on Jul 20, 2005 23:22:37 GMT -5
well i liked the book, the GoF is still one of my favorties. But i mean, can the portrait tell you everything...i mean there would be no point in Voldmort doing all these horcrouxes if you could just live on through the portrait,,Snape is bad! lol and that is my final answer....until Book 7 comes out and he turns out to be good...then i will deny what i said a swear i thought he was good all along lol..hehe
|
|
|
Post by Honus on Jul 21, 2005 1:05:25 GMT -5
I think that the portrait is kind of like a ghost. It 'recorded' Dumbledore at the time he died. it is an imprint of his soul, in a way. Kinda strange when you think about it. Nonetheless....Thereby, I think that this Dumbledore portrait would know all about the Horcruxes and whatnot.
|
|
|
Post by Enelamra Faye on Jul 21, 2005 3:13:19 GMT -5
I'm just thinking about the Chocolate Frog cards... Can Dumbledore (the portrait) move from each place to place? I dunno... What if Dumbledore (the one who could still be alive) is talking through a Chocolate Frog card and the Dumbledore in the portrait would just carry on the message. Lol. Whacky theory...
And HBP was cool. I laughed, I cried... Literally. Lol.
|
|
|
Post by blorg358 on Jul 21, 2005 6:50:51 GMT -5
Ya, portraits and pictures are strange... she's never really explained how they work, has she? Maybe in the seventh.. or on her website
|
|
|
Post by Enelamra Faye on Jul 21, 2005 19:06:55 GMT -5
She shows how they're used and how and why they move and stuff but then she's hasn't really set any kind of importance on them, though... Okay, maybe she does in some way... Lol. Maybe they'll be useful in the 7th book like in OotP.
|
|
|
Post by blorg358 on Jul 23, 2005 17:27:56 GMT -5
Maybe... Darn, I wish they asked about pictures in the interview... a 2 hour interview isnt long enough!! lol
|
|
|
Post by Mary9836 on Jul 23, 2005 22:42:58 GMT -5
haha, well i just think the pictures are useful but not something to get advice from. I mean if they kept taking orders from a painting after awhile they wouldn't need a new headmaster or minister of magic. I think the paintings are, like someone said before, an imprint of the person when the photo was taken.
|
|